Winner Championship Events
1986 FTM | MOTION #?? |
That an athlete who competes in a championship event must also compete in that event in the open championships. |
1987 FTM | MOTION #31 |
That individual age divisions place to seven. Top three advance to divisionals. Place top 5 in divisionals. The first place divisional winner advances to Grand Nationals. |
1987 FTM | MOTION #43 |
That the terminology "Canadian Novice/Intermediate Winner" be changed to "Canadian B Level Winner". |
1987 FTM | MOTION #44 ** RESCINDED - 95 FTM - MOTION #48 |
Moved that any athlete winning a divisional B level Canadian Winner event move to the advanced category upon winning that event, beginning with the 1988 Canadian Championships. |
1988 FTM | MOTION #3 |
That at future Canadian Team Championships, the following format be used to qualify for finals:
|
1989 FTM | MOTION #37 (RATIFIED - 89 FBM - MOTION #16) |
Nancy Beachin moved that in National Individual Level A and Level B title events where single age divisions are used, if there are 15 or more athletes, Qualifying Rounds must be run with the top 7 athletes advancing to compete in the Final Round. |
1989 FTM | MOTION #38 (RATIFIED - 89 FBM - MOTION #16) |
Nancy Beachin moved that at provincial and regional Level A and Level B title events, single age divisions will not be run (Divisional Events only). If there are 15 or more athletes in one division, qualifying rounds must be run to select the top 7. |
1989 FTM | MOTION #39a (RATIFIED - 89 FBM - MOTION #16) |
Myra Kirk moved that for National Championships the following revisions be made to the minimum number of judges to be used in Level A & B Title Events in Solo, Medley, Solo Dance and 2-Baton:
|
1989 FTM | MOTION #39b (RATIFIED - 89 FBM - MOTION #16) |
Myra Kirk moved that for Provincial and Regional Championships the minimum number of judges for all Divisional Rounds will be two (2) |
1989 FTM | MOTION #41 (RATIFIED - 89 FBM - MOTION #16) |
Pat Stevenson moved that in divisions for individual events where there are 30 or more competitors, a qualifying round will be run to select the top 15 and then the top 7 at all provincial, regional and national championships. |
1989 FTM | MOTION #42 (RATIFIED - 89 FBM - MOTION #16) |
Nancy Beachin moved that at provincial and regional championships, the same judges MAY be permitted to judge the rounds of a divisional. |
1989 FTM | MOTION #43 (RATIFIED - 89 FBM - MOTION #16) |
Nancy Beachin moved that at the National level the judges doing single age 1st round and final round MAY also be permitted to judge the same division. |
1989 FBM | MOTION #11 |
Betty Davis moved that the Canadian National Championships will offer only Level A and B events. Eff: Jan 1/90 |
1990 STM | MOTION #4 |
Myra Kirk moved that in all classifications at regional championships, with the exception of the world team events, athletes must reside in the region they are competing in. |
1991 STM | MOTION #6 (RATIFIED - 91 SBM - MOTION #24) |
Debbie Nikolai moved that at all CBTF events where more than one judge is used in a division, that all judges receive a copy of the results, and that a copy must be sent by the Contest Director to the National Judges Rep within 30 days of the event - effective with the 1991 Canadian Championships. |
1992 STM | MOTION #6 (RATIFIED - 92 SBM - MOTION #27) |
Nancy Beachin moved that at all CBTF Provincial and Regional Championships, all major events must be offered by the competition director (these events do not have to be held on the same day). |
1992 STM | MOTION #26 (RATIFIED - 92 SBM - MOTION #27) (AMENDED - 2006 SBM - MOTION #6) |
Myra Kirk moved that when 3 or more (judges) are used (eg: Canadian Individual/Duet Winner/Championship rounds, Individual/Duet Grand Nationals), the majority of firsts takes precedence over place points. Should a tie occur, place points shall be added and, if a tie still exists, then scores will be added. |
1993 WTM | MOTION #18 (RATIFIED - FEB 93 CONFERENCE CALL) |
Theresa Eyssens moved that, further to Motion #2 of 1992 Fall BOD Meeting, athletes must qualify in their age division at a provincial level to then move on to compete at the National Championships in their divisions. They will not compete in single age divisions provincially or nationally. |
1993 STM | MOTION #15 (AMENDED & RATIFIED - 93 SBM - MOTION #26) |
Carrie McKitrick moved that Level B Winner Events be reinstated as a competitive event at the National competition. |
1993 STM | MOTION #43 (RATIFIED - 93 SBM - MOTION #18) |
Myra Kirk moved that an alternate athlete will not be eligible to compete once the last qualifying athlete from their residing province has taken the due to injury or mishap at the Canadian Championships in Individual events. |
1993 FTM | MOTION #33 (RATIFIED - 93 FBM) |
Betty Davis moved that Level B athletes qualify using the same procedure as Level A athletes for Canadian Level B Winner events. |
1993 FTM | MOTION #34 (RATIFIED - 93 FBM; AMENDED - 2001 SBM - Mot #26) AMENDED - 2008 FBM Motion #35 |
That an athlete, duet or group must compete in an event at the Canadian Championships in the same status level (and, in the case of teams, the same size) as they qualified for at their Provincial Championships. CLARIFICATION: the athlete/duet/group's status does not change in that event IF they are competing at the Canadian Championships of that year. Effective Immediately |
1994 FTM | MOTION #22 |
Ron Kopas moved that judges' overtime rate is not applicable at Canadian Team Trials and Canadian Nationals due to financial considerations. |
1995 FTM | MOTION #48 (RATIFIED - 95 FBM) |
Ron Kopas moved that "B" individual/duet Winners at Canadians must count that win as one (1) towards advancement to next higher status level. INTENT: No "grandfather" clause for athletes who have already competed in a Level A event but if he/she has won a Level B event at 1995 Canadians, and haven't yet competed in Level A, they may remain at Level B and count as one towards advancement. |
1995 FTM | MOTION #49 (RATIFIED - 95 FBM) |
Ron Kopas moved that we rescind Motion #44 (1987 Fall Technical Meeting) which reads: "That any athlete winning a divisional Level B Canadian Winner Event move to the advanced category upon winning that event, beginning with the 1988 Canadian Championships." |
1996 STM | PROPOSAL #5 (RATIFIED - 96 FBM - MOTION #9) |
Brenda Hall proposed that the Competition Manual (Page 5-6) be revised to read:
|
1997 FBM | MOTION #17 |
Betty Davis moved that:
INTENT: To provide an accurate record for determining awards and advancement. CBTF will pay the costs. Effective: Jan 1/98 |
1997 FBM | PROPOSAL #19 (RATIFIED - 97 FBM - MOTION #22a) |
Ron Kopas proposed that in multiple judging situations, if one or more judges protects his/her first place, the class is protected. Eff: Jan 1/98 |
1999 WTM | PROPOSAL #4 (RATIFIED - 99 SBM - MOTION #12) |
Dana Peteleski proposed that if, after qualifying at a Provincial Winner Event, a Level B athlete advances to and competes in Level A in that event, that athlete relinquishes their qualifying spot in the Level B Event at the Canadian Winner Event. The athlete may compete in competitions between their Provincials and Canadians in BI if they choose. Effective Immediately |
1999 FBM | MOTION #20 (replaces 99 FTM Prop #18) ** RESCINDED - 2003 SBM - MOTION #12 |
Karen Gratton moved that every division at the Canadian Winner/ Championship (Individual/Duet) Event have two rounds with the top 7 or 50% of the athletes (to a maximum of 15 athletes) advancing to a final round. |
1999 FTM | PROPOSAL #19 (RATIFIED - 99 FBM - MOTION #23) **RESCINDED - 2003 SBM - MOTION #12 |
Ron Kopas proposed that the Order of Appearance for the Final Rounds at the Canadian Winner/Championship (Individual/Duet) Event be reverse order of placement from the first (preliminary) round. INTENT: To give athletes who advance to the finals recognition for their placement. |
1999 FBM | MOTION #21 ** RESCINDED - 2003 SBM -MOTION #12 |
Myra Kirk moved that at Provincial Winner/Championship (Individual/ Duet) Events, should two rounds be run, the order of appearance for Final Rounds would be in reverse order of placement from the first (preliminary) round. |
1999 FTM | PROPOSAL #20 (AMENDED & RATIFIED - 99 FBM - MOTION #23) ** RESCINDED - 2003 SBM - MOTION #12 |
Wendy Cruickshank proposed that:
|
2002 SBM | MOTION #25 **SEE 2005 FBM MOTION #27 BELOW **SEE 2008 SBM MOTION #14 BELOW |
Karen Gratton moved that the only competitions that will be sanctioned during the period of May 1-31st (including weekends that include those dates) will be Type "A" competitions (ie: Provincial Team Trials and Championships) and Type "C" competitions (ie; closed, studio, "fun" events). CLARIFICATION #1: M3, 4 and 5 Judges will only be available to judge Type "A" competitions during this "blackout" period. CLARIFICATION #2: The CBTF Sanction Officer will have the authority to award sanction permits to Type "B" competition requests IF a date during this "blackout" period is open and available. CLARIFICATION #3: Exception - Type "B" Open Competitions held in conjunction with Provincials. |
Feb 03 BOD Conf Call | MOTION #4 (AMENDED - 2004 FBM - Motion #48) |
Janet Chisholm moved that we separate BN and BI categories in CBTF Individual and Duet Events at all local, novelty, Provincial and National Championships. Effective Immediately |
Feb 03 BOD Conf Call | MOTION #5 (**AMENDED - 2005 FBM - MOTION #34) (**AMENDED-07 FBM-MOT #39) (**AMENDED-08 FBM-MOT #15, see Motion below) |
Joyce Ormshaw moved that the following procedure to determine rounds be used for NATIONAL BN, BI and A Winner/Championship Individual and Duet Events:
Effective Immediately |
Feb 03 BOD Conf Call | MOTION #6 (**AMENDED - 2005 FBM - MOTION #34) |
Elva Taylor moved that the following procedure be used for PROVINCIAL BN, BI and A Winner/Championship Individual and Duet Events:
Effective Immediately |
2003 SBM | MOTION #29 |
Tina Larson moved that athletes who qualify at their provincials for individual/duet events can choose to enter EITHER the Open OR the Winner/Championship Event at the National Championships. Effective Immediately |
2004 SBM | MOTION #14 (AMENDED - 2005 FBM - MOTION 18) |
Karen Gratton moved that, when an Open Competition is held in conjunction with a Provincial Championship on the same weekend, the province shall determine the schedule. Effective Immediately |
2005 FBM | MOTION #27 |
Wendy Cruickshank moved that Open Competitions will be allowed on the same weekend as a Provincial Team Trial and/or Championship event providing the following condition is met: Open Competition Director must contact the National Judges' Rep to ensure the judges for the Provincial Team Trials/Championship have been secured. |
2008 SBM | MOTION #14 |
Karen Gratton moved that the CBTF Sanction Officer be directed to NO SANCTION any Type B (Open) Competitions on dates that have been officially designated for Type A Provincial Team Trials and Championships. CLARIFICATION: The CBTF Technical Chair shall have the authority to permit an Open Type B Competition to be sanctioned if all the judges have been hired and contracted for the provincials on that particular date. (Exception: those Type B Competitions that are held in conjunction with provincials). |
2009 SEM | MOTION #1 |
Karen Gratton moved that the timing penalty for all Freestyles and Pairs at the 2009 Canadian Team Trial Winner/Championship Event will be reduced from 4.0 to 1.0 point. CLARIFICATION: The WBTF penalty of 4.0 is disproportionately wrong in relation to the severity of the infraction. CLARIFICATION: CBTF President to discuss this at the WBTF summer meetings in Australia with a recommendation that WBTF review all penalties. |
2009 SBM | MOTION #9 |
Sandra Watt moved that CBTF approve the following:
|
2009 SEM | MOTION #2 |
Karen Gratton moved that, with regards to a request to reduce the number of rounds for the Level A Pairs at the 2009 Canadian Team Trial Event Championships, the CBTF Executive support a unanimous agreement presented in writing and signed by all involved coaches to hold only one round for the level A Pairs. CLARIFICATION: An electrical fire and subsequent lengthy delay of the competition prompted this request. NOTE: After the meeting the schedules were re-arranged & consequently two rounds were able to be run successfully for Level A Pairs with no problem. |
2009 FBM | MOTION #15 (2009 FTM-Prop #5) |
Karen Gratton moved to accept the following changes to the Feb 03 Board Conference Call Motion #5:
|
2009 FBM | MOTION #16 (2009 FTM-Prop #6) |
Karen Gratton moved:
Effective Immediately |
EDITOR'S NOTE: THE FOLLOWING MOTIONS (2009 FBM - Motion #17 & Motion #18) & THEIR AMENDMENTS WERE DISCUSSED AT THE 2009 FBM AND VIA E-VOTING (underlined) DURING DECEMBER 2009. THE FINAL MOTION - AND THE ONE THAT WAS ULTIMATELY FOLLOWED AT THE 2010 CANADIANS - IS THE EVOTE CONDUCTED ON MARCH 12, 2010 (E04-10) - see below.
2009 FBM | MOTION #17 (2009 FTM-Amendment to Prop #7) AMENDED - Dec 7/09 BOD E-Vote E17-09 |
LeeAnn Wilson moved to accept the following amendment to Proposal #7, 2009 FTM:
CLARIFICATION: In a World Championship year, the Level A events shall have no titile, shall not re-compete in Grand Nationals. Members of the Canadian contingent shall be invited to perform but shall not be eligible to enter. CLARIFICATION: In an International Cup year, the Level A events shall carry the title "Canadians Freestyle/Pair Champion" but shall not re-compete in Grand Nationals. CLARIFICATION: Effective Immediately |
2009 FBM | MOTION #18 (Amended 2009 FBM - PROP #7) AMENDED - Dec 7/09 BOD E-Vote E18-09 |
Karen Gratton moved that:
CLARIFICATION: CBTF Age Divisions shall be used. CLARIFICATION: Age Divisions to be used at Provincials and Canadian Team Trials and Canadian Winner/Championship Events to be as follows for all years beginning in 2010:
Effective Immediately |
2009 FBM | MOTION #19 (2009 FTM - Prop#8) |
Karen Gratton moved that, on International Cup years, when Level A Team Trial events are offered at Canadian Championships, Level A athletes and pairs must enter and compete in their provincial team trial events in the same year in order to qualify to enter and compete at Canadians. CLARIFICATION: Age Divisions to be used at Provincials & Canadian Team Trials and Canadian Winner/Championships are as follows:
Effective Immediately |
2009 FBM | MOTION #20 (2009 FTM - Prop#9) |
Karen Gratton moved that:
|
2009 FBM | MOTION #35 (2009 FTM - Prop #23) |
Karen Gratton moved that competition officials for Provincial and Open competitions shall make the decision whether scores at their competition shall be flashed or not. |
EXEC E-VOTE MAR 12/10 | MOTION #E04-10 |
Joanne Moser moved that members of the Canadian Contingent are allowed to enter the Freestyle and Pair events at the 2010 Canadian Winner/Championship competition. The winner of the level A event shall carry the title of Canadian Freestyle (or Pair) Champion but shall not re-compete in Grand Nationals. CLARIFICATION: This replaces the "perform but not compete" provisions of FBM Motion #17 and FBM Motion #18 & their amendments. Effective Immediately |
2010 FBM | MOTION #17 |
Elan Paluck moved to accept Proposal 10 from the 2010 FTM - primary age division for CBTF group events at opens and Provincials - as follows:
|
2011 FBM | MOTION #9 |
Elan Paluck moved that CBTF appoint Joanne Moser and Janice Larkin as Co-Competition Directors for the 2012 Canadian Winner/Championship event. |
2011 FBM | MOTION #25 - 2011 FTM Proposal 7 |
Elan Paluck moved that scores be flashed at both Preliminary and Final Rounds at the Canadian Winner/Championship Events. |
2011 FBM | MOTION #26 - 2011 FTM Proposal 8 |
Elan Paluck moved that, in order to support the CBTF Progressional Model, the following elimination of age divisions at the Canadian Winner/Championships shall apply:
CLARIFICATION: These divisions will continue to be offered at the Canadian Open Competition. |
2011 FBM | MOTION #27 - 2011 FTM Proposal 9 |
Elan Paluck moved that Theme Production be moved to the status of a CBTF Minor Event. Effective: September 1, 2012 |
2012 FBM | MOTION #27 (2012 FTM Prop #12) |
Elan Paluck moved move to accept the following procedure with regards to the hosting of provincial qualifying events for athletes from member provinces and athletes from non-member provinces:
|
2012 FBM | MOTION 29 (2012 FTM Prop #14) |
Elan Paluck moved that the following rules and procedures shall be in effect for the Canadian Level A and B Freestyle and Pair Winner/Championship Events. Qualification Procedure Rounds Compulsory Moves Short Program Music Tests Grand Nationals Awards Other Stipulations CLARIFICATION: This shall rescind the 2005 motion and amend the 2010 motion |
2013 Board eVote | eVote B13-04 |
Move that the flooring surfaces used for all CBTF-sanctioned competitions and events (eg: clinics, workshops) must be deemed suitable for baton twirling and safe for athletes by the Event Directors (and, if necessary, in consultation with the CBTF Technical Chairperson). Wooden flooring shall be considered the most favorable choice and all attempts to secure a facility with a wooden floor shall be made; however flooring that is also used for other sporting or dance activities (eg: "TempoTile") shall be deemed acceptable. OTHER POINTS
DIRECTIVES
Effective: Immediately |
2013 Board eVote | eVote B13-05 |
That, due to the potential risk & danger factor, the following shall be permitted for use by athletes only in confined and designated spaces in practice/warmup areas at CBTF sanctioned competitions:
CLARIFICATIONS
Effective: Immediately |
2013 Fall Conference | MOTION #15 (2013 Pre-FTM Proposal 4) |
Karen Gratton proposed that the level an athlete/duet/group competes in at their Provincial W/C event, is the level they must compete in at the Canadian W/C event. If, during or after the Provincial Winner Event, a Level BN or BI athlete/duet or Level B group receives an advancement score, they must remain in the lower level until after the Canadian W/C Event. If a Level BN or BI athlete/duet/group chooses to compete in the higher division at any open competition that is held between their Provincial W/C Event and the Canadian W/C event, they relinquish their qualifying spot at the Canadian W/C Event in that event. An athlete/duet/group that chooses to enter and compete at a higher level, however, is still eligible to enter the Open Competition held in conjunction with the Canadian W/C Event. Athletes/duets/groups that are not competing in that event at the Canadian W/C event, must advance to, and compete in, the higher level at the next open competition they enter. CLARIFICATION: This shall replace Motion #12 of the 1999 SBM. |
2013 Fall Conference | MOTION #16 (Pre-FTM Proposal 5) |
Karen Gratton proposed to accept the CBTF Events Tie-Breaking Process as presented at the 2013 Pre-FTM Meeting. Refer to the attached chart (Tie-Breaking Process Summary Chart - CBTF Events.pdf) |
2013 Fall Conference | MOTION #14 (2013 Pre-FTM Proposal 3) |
Karen Gratton proposed that the following rules and procedures shall be in effect for all Provincial Level B and A Freestyle and Pair Winner/Championship Events or Level A Provincial Team Trials. Qualification Procedure Rounds Compulsory Moves Short Program Music Tests/Costume Checks Awards Berths Other Stipulations CLARIFICATION: This shall rescind the 2009 motion/clarification |
2013 Fall Conference | MOTION #22 (Technical Proposal 2) |
Karen Gratton proposed to accept the WBTF Events Tie-Breaking Process as presented. Refer to 2013 Fall Board Mtg - WBTF Events Tie-Breaking Process.pdf |
2013 Fall Conference | MOTION #31 |
I move that the CBTF adopt the Awards Policy as noted on the attached appendix. (refer to CBTF Competition Awards Policy) |
2014 FBM | MOTION #20 |
Elan moved that 2014 FTM Proposal #11 be accepted:
|